Pro-abortion Democrats fight aggressively not only for the right of people to do what is pictured but for more of it via taxpayer-funding.  And some of those people actually claim the name of Christ, the author of life!

Their hypocrisy is unbelievable.  They speak of moral visions and being in this together at the same time advancing an anti-God culture of death.

President Obama once again offered a progressive, moral vision for America during last night’s State of the Union Address – a choice between an America where we’re all in this together or where some people put their personal self interests ahead of the common good, a return to the policies of the past.

via The State Of The Union: Progressive Progress Or Return To A Failed Past?.

They’ll have a lot of time to think about those images when they are in Hell, although I hope they repent and believe in the mean time.  Even false teachers like them can be saved by the blood of Christ.

That’s typical of the “social justice” crowd.  What could be more unjust than ignoring that 3,000+ human beings are crushed and dismembered each day in the U.S. alone just because they are unwanted?  What about the tens of millions of gender selection abortions that kill females for the sole reason that they are female? What about 90% of Down Syndrome children killed because they are a little different?

Wallis has a big microphone but just uses it to advance his politics-disguised-as-religion wealth redistribution schemes.

See “Observe the Roe v. Wade Anniversary by Staying Vigilant and Taking Action” for a shining example.  

As the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice celebrates the 39th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the war on women rages on,

War on women?  What about gender selection abortions that have killed tens of millions of females for the sole reason that they are female?

and we who trust women and respect their decisions

Those are empty words.  What if the women wanted to kill their toddlers?  Would you trust and respect their decisions?

must renew our commitment to protecting this landmark Supreme Court ruling. On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court said, in simple terms, that women have a constitutional right to privacy to make decisions about whether to have an abortion. Because this decision involves moral as well as medical considerations, the Court ruled, a woman has the right to consider her personal circumstances and the dictates of her conscience. 

Again, if her conscience permits her to kill her toddler is that adequate?  Of course not.  So the only question is, “What is the unborn?”  The scientific fact is that they are human beings.

It’s especially important for the pro-faith community to speak out now.

Read: Fake Christians.

 

For the past year, zealots in Congress and state legislatures

So trying to save the lives of innocent human beings makes one a zealot, but President Obama’s fight to be able to kill those who survive abortions is not zealotry?

– many of whom preach the sanctity of privacy and freedom from government –

 

Can women kill their toddler’s in private?  No, so privacy isn’t the issue.

“Freedom from the government” ignores that they are protecting a human life who should be free from being crushed and dismembered.

have relentlessly waged a vicious war on women’s access to health care.

Crushing and dismembering innocent human beings is not health care.

More than 1,000 bills were introduced in state legislatures, including the Ohio “heartbeat” bill banning abortion after the 6th or 7th week of gestation, and numerous bills requiring pregnant women to have ultrasounds. In 2011, 92 anti-abortion provisions were enacted – the most in any year since Roe v. Wade was decided!

Yea!  Keep up the fight, pro-lifers!  That is great progress.

This is classic liberalism.  The rebuttal would be a mockery of the OWS, with more realistic examples.  The OWS Jesus would be pro-rape, pro-drug abuse, pro-violence, pro-using children as shields, pro-asking Caesar to take money by force from neighbor A to “give” to neighbor B on to give credit to the OWS (or better yet, to “give” to the OWS.  Or you could do all those for basic liberals and add in “pro-abortion Jesus” and “pro-lgbtq Jesus.”

It is hard to parody the false teachers when they do it themselves first!

The worst part is this:

It takes an informed and curious mind to deal with complex issues that have such important moral implications.  Will we leave the world better for our children and generations to come

via People of Faith Should Consider Cornilles’ Views On Climate Change #OR1.

It takes a fully seared conscience to be a radical pro-abort like Chuck while preaching about the moral implications of bogus climate change power grabs on children and future generations.

His typical claim that politicized national “Christian” groups support his agenda proves nothing.

False teacher Chuck Currie often refers to MLK’s “beloved kingdom” and even did an entire sermon on MLK (since Chuck considers Jesus just to be a man and not worthy of worship, such as Chuck’s worship of Charles Darwin — but that’s another topic).

But as much as MLK did, he had a very flawed theology.  And now it makes sense as to why Chuck worships MLK instead of just admiring his secular accomplishments!  Read Dr. Martin Luther King-Respected Civil Rights Activist and a False Teacher!! to learn more.

To show what a nice guy I am to Chuck I’ll go ahead and point out that the author of the link is black.  I say that because Chuck is a notorious race-baiter.  He once called Pastor D.L. Foster a racist — until Chuck read my blog and found out that Foster is black!

You see, some of us focus on the content of someone’s character and the accuracy of their theology when we make judgments.  We don’t just judge them — for good or bad — by the color of their skin.

First, I have no idea who this is that Chuck is criticizing, but I would oppose the peeing on the Taliban bit.

But the rest of the post was pure gold by pro-abortion false teacher Chuck Currie.  He does his typical “most Christians” bit, assuming that if the Leftist NCC and similar groups say something that all their members agree.  We call that stupid logic.

Chuck is as uninformed on scientific matters as he is on theology.  Even if the climate change hoax hadn’t been unmasked in deep detail by the email finds, the global warming bit has long been debunked.  And even if it wasn’t, there is no proof that it would have been caused by man.  So Chuck fails on at least 4 levels.

And Chuck ends with the “love your neighbor” passage, which rings hollow since Chuck not only blesses the crushing of 3,000+ neighbors each day in the U.S., he wants to increase that number by requiring taxpayer funded abortions.  That’s just one example.

The Greatest Commandment: Chuck’s doin’ it wrong.

First, I should note that Romney is an awful candidate.  If he had a “D” after is name then false teacher Chuck would him: pro-legalized abortion, Obamacare architect, etc.  He’s just not as flaming of a liberal as Obama so Chuck is going after him.

First, the Romney quote in question:

“Everywhere he goes we hear him talking about millionaires and billionaires and executives and Wall Street. It’s a very envy-oriented, attack-oriented approach and I think it’ll fail.”

If Chuck were intellectually honest, he’d say that Obama is a raging hypocrite because he is the one taking the most money from Wall Street!  While false teacher Chuck gives sermons on why Jesus would be pro-OWS, he ignores that his hero is by far the largest recipient of their largesse.

So is Chuck ignorant, a hypocrite, or both?

We ought to be talking about these issues in every venue because, as William Jennings Bryan once said, every great economic question is in reality a great moral question.

Yes, we should talk about economics.  But that doesn’t mean the liberal solutions are good.

Have you seen the video of the lady with 12 kids by multiple fathers who insists that others have to take care of her?  She is a product of Chuck’s ideology and false religion.

My advice to Romney would be to talk more about this as well, but for the opposite reasons Chuck has.  I’d just keep asking who has received the most from Wall Street millionaires, then ask who is playing the class warfare card (Obama and Obama).

It isn’t about envy.

Yes, it is.

It is about homeless children and their families sleeping outdoors because of economic policies that benefit the wealthy while those Jesus would have called the “least of these” are left behind.

More hypocrisy: Chuck is wildly pro-abortion, even lobbying for taxpayer-funded abortions. Seems to me that involves killing the “least of these.”

And of course, he hasn’t proved that conservative policies caused those problems.  Hint: Look at inner city problems then note that Democrats have had virtual monopolies on their education and politics for half a century.  That’s the problem!

It’s about growing hunger in a land of plenty.  For Christians and other people of faith, it is a matter of justice.

If someone came from outer space and saw how the poor in the U.S. lived compared to the rest of the world, they’d ask why everyone else doesn’t follow our model.  Could it be better?  Of course, but more liberal ideas like Chuck’s which are based on sinful coveting will only make things worse.

Chuck, of course, is the guy who spits out Democratic talking points and does whole sermons on why illegal immigration should be legal and why the Occupy movement is Christ-like.  Uh, right.

Bonus hypocrisy: I haven’t seen Chuck express concern that the President — an alleged Constitutional scholar — redefined “recess” to appoint his union donor / cronies.

In the United States there are suppose to be no religious tests to hold public office.  That’s right there in the Constitution (a document conservatives claim to love).  But religious conservatives seem to be doing all in their considerable power to decide who the GOP nominee for president will be.  In short, they trying to imposing a religious test on the presidency.  . . .  Otherwise, why are officials of the Southern Baptist Convention like Richard Land weighing in on the GOP nomination process?  We cannot afford to allow our democracy to devolve into a theocracy.  Religious liberty is at stake in 2012.

via Will Conservative Church Leaders Pick GOP Nominee?.

How can they claim the mantle of “social justice” when they are silent on the destruction of innocent but unwanted human beings and on the hiding of sex crimes?